Search found 47 matches
- Tue Dec 06, 2016 1:10 pm
- Forum: Strategies
- Topic: Limits Of Filtering - What is really possible?
- Replies: 3
- Views: 10551
Re: Limits Of Filtering - What is really possible?
Hi Paperino Mathematically or randomly, it takes about 5400 number of combinations to find one that can math a 5 number in a 6/49 format. To get 8/10 success with 1,000 combinations means about 5x better, less 8/10th. In your case (500 combinations) is 10x better, but if you only hit once in ten occ...
- Mon Dec 05, 2016 11:24 am
- Forum: Strategies
- Topic: Limits Of Filtering - What is really possible?
- Replies: 3
- Views: 10551
Re: Limits Of Filtering - What is really possible?
Hi Paperino, It is a bit quiet here, but we are very effective :). I haven't been here much so was interested to read that you say group of people are able to hit 5/6 from 6/49 1000 blocks and over 80% success rate? Correct me if I am wrong, does that mean matching 5 or 6 numbers in a 6/49 format? d...
- Wed Oct 26, 2016 11:54 pm
- Forum: Lottery Discussion
- Topic: Anyone based in England?
- Replies: 0
- Views: 19928
Anyone based in England?
Anyone in this forum lives in England? please PM me for life changing plan.
- Sun Nov 23, 2014 10:25 am
- Forum: Lottery Discussion
- Topic: I love these programs
- Replies: 30
- Views: 52169
Re: I love these programs
Hi Sooz, Bad result happens but at least we know studying do help us enormously. I started doing the Euromillion only last Month. It's a 5/50+2/11 and that's is really difficult (126m to 1 for the JP). First 2 draws was fantastic and I even hit 2N from 4N. Then next 2 draws, I hits zero. :lol: I eve...
- Sun Nov 09, 2014 8:57 am
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: Like to meet up?
- Replies: 4
- Views: 18579
Re: Like to meet up?
Are you certain NO ONE lives near me? Please reply if you do because I am truly onto something different and I can literally see it coming. I need like minded people to help. No, I am not trying to find the jackpot myself and I have nothing to sell you. My findings are so complicated, I need help an...
- Sun Nov 09, 2014 8:15 am
- Forum: Lottery Discussion
- Topic: Probability formula
- Replies: 3
- Views: 12039
Re: Probability formula
Thanks Lottoarchitect I did buy GAT 2 yrs ago but wasn't what I needed and so I don't understand it really. Yes, the 2 figures I want is 10% and 0.82%, I THINK!!! So, lets go through it again just to be sure. If I just get to predict ONE SINGLE NUMBER ONLY from the 5 drawn numbers in 5/50 game I hav...
- Sat Nov 08, 2014 10:51 pm
- Forum: Lottery Discussion
- Topic: I love these programs
- Replies: 30
- Views: 52169
Re: I love these programs
Great results sooz. Beat the maths too.
Gat must be be very useful. Ooops, I know nothing about it!
Good luck everyone and get the big one just in time for this X'mas.
Gat must be be very useful. Ooops, I know nothing about it!
Good luck everyone and get the big one just in time for this X'mas.
- Sat Nov 08, 2014 10:42 pm
- Forum: Lottery Discussion
- Topic: Probability formula
- Replies: 3
- Views: 12039
Probability formula
Hi Can any experts (Yes, Anastaious), tell me the formula to calculate the probability of selecting just one single number appearing? Example in a 5/50 game, if I said number 13 will appear in next draw, what is the odds? Is it 49/5? and if I then predict 2 numbers, how do I calculate the odds of BO...
- Tue Oct 28, 2014 12:11 pm
- Forum: Lottery Discussion
- Topic: I love these programs
- Replies: 30
- Views: 52169
Re: I love these programs
Countifs is also great! 6/45 = 8 million tickets. 3N and above prize winnings tickets means just 2% are winning tickets. This = 1 in 42. Buy 20 tickets means 42/20 = 1 win in 2.1 attempts. But, you get 40 tickets, this means you win 1 in 1.2. This explains why you hit every time. Why is it better th...
- Tue Nov 19, 2013 6:36 pm
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: Drawn numbers in order based on crietera
- Replies: 2
- Views: 10296
Re: Drawn numbers in order based on crietera
Hi
Oh yes, forgot you had that, sorry.
Cheers
Oh yes, forgot you had that, sorry.
Cheers