Search found 1249 matches

by lottoarchitect
Thu Feb 06, 2020 6:12 pm
Forum: General Discussion
Topic: Filter when k <> m
Replies: 7
Views: 4867

Re: Filter when k <> m

Correction for your post, you mention C (10,6,5,6) = 14 Yes this definitely can be reduced with FD % given M=K. What you care about is to reach FD to 100% (also enable the check box filtered over overall). Unconditional coverage obviously will not be at 100% but the assumption here is your guide fil...
by lottoarchitect
Thu Feb 06, 2020 6:07 pm
Forum: General Discussion
Topic: Filter when k <> m
Replies: 7
Views: 4867

Re: Filter when k <> m

A requirement to be able to evaluate the FD % is to have M=K. Under that condition, you can reduce blocks from an unconditional 100% cover, like the C (10,6,5,6) = 14 with the introduction of additional filters (guide/mother), similar to the initial M condition. It is impossible to reduce blocks via...
by lottoarchitect
Thu Feb 06, 2020 1:43 pm
Forum: General Discussion
Topic: History Performance in original order too
Replies: 10
Views: 4771

Re: History Performance in original order too

At its current implementation it scans augmentative tables just like what GAT 3.0 delivers with the inclusion of internally used Hits+Delay information. As it goes through each produced GAT table, it picks it as the current candidate if that table results in more total hits production + Hits/delay s...
by lottoarchitect
Thu Feb 06, 2020 1:09 pm
Forum: General Discussion
Topic: Filter when k <> m
Replies: 7
Views: 4867

Re: Filter when k <> m

Hi ccampos, whenever you introduce a filter in guide mode (or use a mother), you introduce the possibility one particular combination that is necessary to make an 100% unconditional cover unavailable. Ability to make an 100% unconditional cover using guide filters is completely dependent on the bloc...
by lottoarchitect
Tue Feb 04, 2020 10:47 pm
Forum: General Discussion
Topic: History Performance in original order too
Replies: 10
Views: 4771

Re: History Performance in original order too

What do you mean public?
by lottoarchitect
Fri Jan 31, 2020 5:04 pm
Forum: General Discussion
Topic: History Performance in original order too
Replies: 10
Views: 4771

Re: History Performance in original order too

The online system operates in a different manner to GAT. It uses the same building blocks (the GAT tables) and attempts to combine various results from them. This approach is what I suggested to end up in GAT as the automatic mode. So, no it will not work suggesting settings used by the online syste...
by lottoarchitect
Fri Dec 27, 2019 10:35 pm
Forum: General Discussion
Topic: History Performance in original order too
Replies: 10
Views: 4771

Re: History Performance in original order too

That is under consideration for inclusion.
by lottoarchitect
Tue Nov 05, 2019 9:51 am
Forum: Lottery Discussion
Topic: AI based lotto number prediction
Replies: 37
Views: 10265

Re: AI based lotto number prediction

Since this is not GAT Engine related, I'll move it from the GAT Engine forum to the general lottery discussion.
by lottoarchitect
Wed Oct 16, 2019 2:06 pm
Forum: General Discussion
Topic: Hi all
Replies: 4
Views: 4775

Re: Hi all

Hi Lotto200, you do not mention what software you refer to. This is the sub-forum of Lotto Architect (LA). LA has lots of manipulation features (filters, number groups, wheels) and also includes a Hot/Cold/Due prediction module. Obviously you use the program to produce outcome before the actual draw...
by lottoarchitect
Thu Oct 03, 2019 10:18 am
Forum: General Discussion
Topic: Lotto Architect and Lotofacil (Brazil)
Replies: 2
Views: 2000

Re: Lotto Architect and Lotofacil (Brazil)

At this point LA supports the maximum lottery size it can efficiently handle. Extending analysis capabilities to larger lottery sizes will require huge grid displays and a completely different internal computation engine. If ever support is meant to be added for these games, it would probably be a c...